科学学与科学技术管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (03): 74-89.

• 创新战略与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于系统综述法的新能源汽车产业政策效果评估回顾

  

  1. 1. 华南理工大学 工商管理学院,广州 510640
    2. 华南理工大学 中国企业战略管理研究中心,广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-02 出版日期:2024-04-10 发布日期:2024-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 刘朔,shuoshuo_liu@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:郑爱琳(1987— ),女,汉族,广东江门人,华南理工大学工商管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:新能源汽车产业政策 效果评估、企业管理;刘朔(1983— ),女,汉族,陕西西安人,华南理工大学博士研究生,研究方向:企业战略管理、管理学;蓝 海林(1959— ),男,汉族,广东大浦人,华南理工大学教授、博士生导师、华南理工大学中国企业战略管理研究中心主任,研究 方向:企业战略管理、经济体制改革。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(15JZD020

Systematic Review on the Evaluation of New Energy Vehicle Industry Policy Effect#br#

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China;
    2. China Enterprise Strategic Management Research Center, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • Received:2022-03-02 Online:2024-04-10 Published:2024-04-12

摘要: 从方法论创新对产业政策评估结论差异的成因寻求研究突破,有助于推动政策评估理论研究和产业政策内容不断 完善。新能源汽车产业是当前各国政策制定的热点领域,学者对政策效果进行了大量的评估研究。然而与其他细分领域 的政策效果评估研究相似,新能源汽车产业政策效果评估研究同样存在碎片化和不可比较的研究困境。基于系统综述 法,筛选出175篇新能源汽车产业政策效果评估文献,识别了评估体系的构成要素并在此基础上探讨政策效果评估结论 差异的成因。结果发现(: 1) 新能源汽车产业政策评估体系的要素可以归类为以评估模式为引领,涵括评估标准、评估环 境、评估主体、评估客体、评估方法在内的6类;(2) 要素组合差异是新能源汽车产业政策评估结论差异的重要原因。

关键词: font-family:FZKTK--GBK1-0, font-size:8.93pt, ">方法论;政策评估;新能源汽车产业;政策评估体系

Abstract: The focus of the debate on the effect of industrial policy from all walks of life nowadays is not limited to the problem itself, but to the boundary of the effect of industrial policy. The new energy vehicle industry is a hot area of policy formulation in various countries, and scholars have conducted bountiful research on the evaluation of policy effect. However, as well as the evaluation of policy effect research in other area, there are also fragmented and incomparable research dilemmas in the fields of new energy vehicle industry. Seeking research breakthroughs from methodological innovation on the causes of the differences of the evaluation results of industrial policy is of great significance to promote policy evaluation theory and improve the content of industrial policy. It is particularly urgent to systemically sort out the current complex evaluation elements and find out a deeper explanation for the debate of conclusion of the evaluation of policy effect. The systematic review method optimizes the deviation of literature identification, selection and conclusion through the critical secondary analysis of existing research results to achieve in-depth analysis of specific topics. The method is used to collect articles whose research theme is the evaluation of policy effect on the new energy vehicle industry from 2009 to 2020 from Web of Science. After removing irrelevant data, 175 articles are obtained as research samples. According to the framework of the policy evaluation system and the basic relationship between the evaluation elements from the existing research, the samples are sorted out. The components of evaluation system of the policy effect on the new energy vehicle industry are identified, and the causes of the different conclusions on the evaluation of policy effect are discussed based on the research results. Adopting control variable method, the study compares the impact of different evaluation element and specific evaluation element on the conclusion of evaluation of policy effect one by one. The evaluation standard include the standard of the fact dimension (efficiency, efficiency, adequacy) and the standard of the value dimension(fairness, responsiveness, adaptability);The evaluation environment includes four categories: political environment, economic environment, social environment and technological environment; The evaluation subjects includes stakeholders and independent third parties; The evaluation object includes supply side policy tools (tax relief for producers subsidies, production subsidies, emission standards, industrial planning, etc.) and demand side policy tools (tax relief for consumers, purchase subsidies, government purchases, privileges of using, subsidies of using, etc.);The evaluation method includes qualitative evaluation methods and quantitative evaluation methods. The evaluation model includes positivism, constructivism and critical positivism. Each evaluation element has its impact on the evaluation results and specific evaluation element does its job to the diverse conclusions of the evaluation of policy effect. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) The elements of the evaluation of policy effect on the new energy vehicle industry can be classified into six categories: evaluation standard, evaluation environment, evaluation subject, evaluation object, evaluation method, and evaluation model. (2) The difference in the combination of evaluation factors is an important reason for the different conclusions of the evaluation of policy effect on the new energy vehicle industry. The evaluation model is the "strategic deployment" of the evaluation. Once determined, the selection of other evaluation elements is restricted. The numerous combinations of specific evaluation element have an effect on the difference of evaluation conclusions. The application of this methodology provides a new research idea to solve the dilemma of the evaluation of policy effect, and promotes the optimization of evaluation of policy effect on the new energy industry; To the evaluation system, it provides a research perspective for exploring the boundary where industrial policies work.

Key words: systematic review, the evaluation of policy effect, new energy vehicle industry, policy evaluation system

中图分类号: