科学学与科学技术管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (04): 33-51.
收稿日期:
2021-10-19
出版日期:
2024-04-10
发布日期:
2024-04-28
通讯作者:
张惠淼,2110093@tongji.edu.cn
作者简介:
魏峰(1976— ),男,汉族,河南商丘人,同济大学经济与管理学院教授、博士生导师、博士,研究方向:领导力、创业团
队、心理契约;张惠淼(1997— ),女,汉族,山东淄博人,同济大学经济与管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:创新创业、战略管
理;王艺霏(1996— ),女,汉族,山东枣庄人,同济大学经济与管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:组织行为,创业创新。
基金资助:
Received:
2021-10-19
Online:
2024-04-10
Published:
2024-04-28
摘要: 疫情和重大突发危机对于中小企业而言是一次生与死的重大考验。流动性冗余作为应对突发性危机的重要物质 基础,是中小企业突破资源约束实现“危中寻机”的关键。因此,中小企业如何在危机情境下有效部署流动性冗余成为 困扰业界的难题。然而,当前关于冗余效用及情境化研究不仅尚未从时间属性全面探讨特定类型冗余的绩效表现,也 忽视了双元创新活动在其中的差异化传导机制。同时,相较于以往危机情境的“一次性、局域性、短暂性”冲击,冗余对 新冠疫情此类大范围持续性危机的适用性仍需进一步验证。因此,应用资源基础观,以新冠疫情下的中小企业为研究 对象,探讨了危机情境下流动性冗余影响中小企业长短期绩效的内在机理与边界条件。通过对 159 份中小企业的两时 点调查数据进行实证研究,结果发现,在危机情境下:(1) 流动性冗余对中小企业长、短期绩效具有显著的正向影响; (2) 流动性冗余可通过开展探索式创新对中小企业的长、短期绩效产生促进作用,以及通过开展利用式创新对中小企 业的长期绩效产生促进作用;(3) 成长抱负在调节流动性冗余与探索式创新关系的同时,也调节了探索式创新在流动 性冗余与中小企业长、短期绩效间的中介作用;(4) 空间距离在调节流动性冗余与探索式创新关系的同时,也调节了 探索式创新在流动性冗余与中小企业长、短期绩效的中介作用。最后,针对上述结论提出了中小企业在面对危机情境 时如何利用流动性冗余开展创新以促进绩效方面的管理建议。
中图分类号:
魏 峰 张惠淼 王艺霏. 危机情境下流动性冗余、双元创新与 中小企业绩效的关系研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2024, 45(04): 33-51.
WEI Feng, ZHANG Huimiao, WANG Yifei. Research on the Relationship among Discretionary Slack, Ambidextrous Innovation and SMEs Performance in Crisis Context[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2024, 45(04): 33-51.
陈建安. 2019. 创业成长抱负:研究综述与展望[J]. 经济管理,41(2):191-208. (Chen J A. 2019. Entrepreneurial growth ambition:Literature review and prospects[J]. Business and Management Journal,41(2): 191-208.) 顾群,翟淑萍. 2014. 融资约束、研发投资与资金来源:基于研发投资异质性的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,35(3):15-22. (Gu Q, Zhai S P. 2014. Financial constraints, R&D investment and funding sources: The perspective of R&D heterogeneity[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T.,35(3):15-22.) 李瑞雪,彭灿,杨晓娜. 2019. 双元创新与企业可持续发展:短期财务绩效与长期竞争优势的中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策,36(17): 81-89. (Li R X, Peng C, Yang X N. 2019. Dual innovation and corporate sustainable development: The mediating role of short-term financial performance and long-term competitive advantage[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy,36(17): 81-89.) 李晓翔,刘春林. 2011. 突发事件情境下冗余资源与公司绩效的关系研究:以汶川地震为例[J]. 财经研究,37(2):124-134. (Li X X, Liu C L. 2011. A study on the relationship between organizational slack and corporate performance in emergencies: Taking Wenchuan earthquake as an example[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics,37(2):124-134.) 李欣融,孟猛猛,雷家骕. 2020. 地理距离对企业社会责任的影响研究[J]. 管理学报,19(2):254-262. (Li X R, Meng M M, Lei J S. 2020. The research on the impact of geographical distance on corporate social responsibility[J]. Chinese Journal of Management,19(2):254-262.) 李雪灵,刘源,樊镁汐,等. 2022. 平台型组织如何从新冠疫情事件中激活韧性?基于事件系统理论的案例研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 34(5):149-163. (Li X L, Liu Y, Fan M X, et al. 2022. How platform-based organizations activate resilience under the COVID-19 Situation? A case study based on event system theory[J]. R&D Management,34(5):149-163.) 李自杰,张般若. 2020. 基于复合基础观的组织冗余与新兴市场企业国际化速度研究:环境丰富性与组织双元并进的调节作用[J]. 东 北大学学报(社会科学版),22(4):21-28. (Li Z J, Zhang B R. 2020. A research on organizational slack and speed of internationalization of emerging market firms based on composition-based view: The moderating effect of environmental munificence and organizational ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science),22(4):21-28.) 彭新敏,慈建栋,刘电光. 2022. 危机情境下组织韧性形成过程研究:基于注意力配置视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,43(6): 145-160. (Peng X M, Ci J D, Liu D G. 2022. Research on the formation process of organizational resilience in crisis context: From the perspective of attention allocation[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T.,43(6):145-160.) 许明星,郑蕊,饶俪琳,等. 2020. 妥善应对现于新冠肺炎疫情中“心理台风眼效应”的建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊,35(3):273-282. (Xu M X, Zheng R, Rao L L, et al. 2020. Proposals for coping with "Psychological Typhoon Eye" effect detected in COVID-19[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,35(3):273-282.) 邹增明,刘明霞,邹思明. 2019. 冗余资源、CEO产出型职能经验对企业二元创新的影响[J]. 管理学报,16(8):1179-1187. (Zou Z M, Liu M X, Zou S M. 2019. The effects of slack resources, CEO's output functional experience on firms’ambidextrous innovation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management,16(8):1179-1187.) Abebe M A, Angriawan A. 2014. Organizational and competitive influences of exploration and exploitation activities in small firms[J]. Journal of Business Research,67(3):339-345. Agusti-Perez M, Galan J L, Acedo F J. 2020. Relationship between slack resources and performance: Temporal symmetry and duration of effects[J]. European Journal of Management and Business Economics,29(3):255-275. Alcalde-Heras H, Iturrioz-Landart C, Aragon-Amonarriz C. 2018. SME ambidexterity during economic recessions:The role of managerial external capabilities[J]. Management Decision,57(1):21-40. Alexiev A S, Jansen J J, Van den Bosch F A, et al. 2010. Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Management Studies,47(7):1343-1364. Archibugi D, Filippetti A, Frenz M. 2013. Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation[J]. Research Policy,42(2):303-314. Autio E, Pathak S, Wennberg K. 2013. Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,44(4):334-362. Bao G, Zhang W, Xiao Z, et al. 2019. Slack resources and growth performance: The mediating roles of product and pro-cess innovation capabilities[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation,28(1):60-76. Barney J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management,17(1):99-120. Benner M J, Tushman M L. 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review,28(2):238-256. Bérard C, Fréchet M. 2020. Organizational antecedents of exploration and exploitation in SMEs: The role of structural and resource attributes[J]. European Business Review,32(2):211-226. Bignami F, Mattsson P, Hoekman J. 2020. The importance of geographical distance to different types of R&D collaboration in the pharmaceutical industry[J]. Industry and Innovation,27(5):513-537. Bourgeois III L J. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack[J]. Academy of Management Review,6(1):29-39. Bradley S W, Shepherd D A, Wiklund J. 2011. The importance of slack for new organizations: Facing“Tough”environments[J]. Journal of Management Studies,48(5):1071-1097. Brown R, Rocha A. 2020. Entrepreneurial uncertainty during the Covid-19 crisis: Mapping the temporal dynamics of entrepreneurial finance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing Insights,(14):e00174. Burns W J, Slovic P. 2012. Risk perception and behaviors: Anticipating and responding to crises[J]. Risk Analysis,32(4): 579-582. Capelleras J L, Contin-Pilart I, Larraza-Kintana M, et al. 2019. Entrepreneurs' human capital and growth aspirations: The moderating role of regional entrepreneurial culture[J]. Small Business Economics,52(1):3-25. Daniel F, Lohrke F T, Fornaciari C J, et al. 2004. Slack resources and firm performance: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Business Research,57(6):565-574. DeTienne D R, Shepherd D A, De Castro J O. 2008. The fallacy of "only the strong survive": The effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions for under-performing firms[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,23(5):528-546. Duan Y Wang W Zhou W. 2020. The multiple mediation effect of absorptive capacity on the organizational slack and innovation performance of high-tech manufacturing firms: Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,229:107754. Efendic A, Mickiewicz T, Rebmann A. 2015. Growth aspirations and social capital: Young firms in a post-conflict environment[J]. International Small Business Journal,33(5):537-561. Estrin S Korosteleva J Mickiewicz T. 2013. Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,28(4):564-580. Gartner W, Liao J. 2012. The effects of perceptions of risk, environmental uncertainty, and growth aspirations on new venture creation success[J]. Small Business Economics,39:703-712. Geiger S W, Cashen L H. 2002. A multidimensional examination of slack and its impact on innovation[J]. Journal of Managerial Issues,14(1):68-84. George G. 2005. Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal,48(4): 661-676. Greenley G E, Oktemgil M. 1998. A comparison of slack resources in high and low performing British companies[J]. Journal of Management Studies,35(3):377-398. Gruenhagen J H, Sawang S, Gordon R, et al. 2018. International experience, growth aspirations,and the internationalisation of new ventures[J]. Journal of International Entrepreneurship,16:421-440. Grüner A, Raastad I. 2018. Financial slack and firm performance during economic downturn[J]. GSL Journal of Business Management and Administrative Affairs,1(1):1-7. Gundry L K, Welsch H P. 2001. The ambitious entrepreneur[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,16(5):453-470.Guo F, Zou B, Zhang X, et al. 2019. Financial slack and firm performance of SMEs in China: Moderating effects of government subsidies and market-supporting institutions[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,223(2020):1-10. Guo J, Zhou B, Zhang H, et al. 2020. Does strategic planning help firms translate slack resources into better performance[J]. Journal of Management & Organization,26(4):395-407. He Z L, Wong P K. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science,15(4):481-494. Henríquez-Daza M, Capelleras J L, Osorio-Tinoco F. 2019. Entrepreneurial engagement and growth aspirations: The moderating role of opportunity perception[J]. International Review of Entrepreneurship,17(2):189-212. Hermans J, Vanderstraeten J, Van Witteloostuijn A, et al. 2015. Ambitious entrepreneurship: A review of growth aspirations,intentions,and expectations[J]. Entrepreneurial Growth: Individual, Firm, and Region,17:127-160. Hillman A J, Withers M C, Collins B J. 2009. Resource dependence theory: A review[J]. Journal of Management,35(6): 1404-1427. Holcomb T R, Holmes R M, Connelly B L. 2009. Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation[J]. Strategic Management Journal,30(5):457-485. Hu H, Chen L, Zhou Y, et al. 2021. Unpacking the effects of organizational slack on exploitative and exploratory innovation: A study of knowledge-intensive firms[J]. Innovation,25(1):57-79. Jahanshahi A A, Brem A, Bhattacharjee A. 2017. Who takes more sustainability-oriented entrepreneurial actions? The role of entrepreneurs' values, beliefs and orientations[J]. Sustainability,9(10):1-19. Jalilvand A, Kim S M. 2013. Matching slack resources and investment strategies to achieve long-term performance: New perspectives on corporate adaptability[J]. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries,10(1):38-52. Jansen J, Van D, Volberda H W. 2006. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Management Science,52(11):1661-1674. Jifri A O, Drnevich P, Tribble L. 2016. The role of absorbed slack and potential slack in improving small business performance during economic uncertainty[J]. Journal of Strategy and Management,9(4):474-491. Jurksiene L, Pundziene A. 2016. The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J], European Business Review,28(4):431-448. Karacay M. 2017. Slack-Performance Relationship Before, During and after a financial Crisis: Empirical Evidence from European Manufacturing Firms[D]. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. Kim D Y, Zhu P. 2018. Supplier dependence and R&D intensity: The moderating role of network centrality and interconnectedness[J]. Journal of Operations Management,64:7-18. Kiss A N, Fernhaber S, McDougall-Covin P P. 2018. Slack, innovation and export intensity: Implications for small-and medium-sized enterprises[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,42(5):671-697. Lau C M. 2011. Team and organizational resources, strategic orientations and firm performance in a transitional economy[J]. Journal of Business Research,64(12):1344-1351. Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman M L. 2010. Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations[J]. Academy of Management Annals,4(1):109-155. Lee S, Singal M, Kang K H. 2013. The corporate social responsibility-financial performance link in the US restaurant industry:Do economic conditions matter[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management,32:2-10. Levie J, Autio E. 2013. Growth and growth intentions[J]. White Paper,1:159-183. Lin H E, McDonough III E F. 2014. Cognitive frames, learning mechanisms and innovation ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,31:170-188. Liu H, Ding X H, Guo H, et al. 2014. How does slack affect product innovation in high-tech Chinese firms: The contingent value of entrepreneurial orientation[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,31(1):47-68. Lubatkin M H, Simsek Z, Ling Y, et al. 2006. Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration[J]. Journal of Management,32(5):646-672. Mahoney J T, Pandian J R. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal,13(5):363-380. Mannor M J, Shamsie J, Conlon D E. 2016. Does experience help or hinder top managers? Working with different types of resources in Hollywood[J]. Strategic Management Journal,37(7):1330-1340. McDermott C M, Prajogo D I. 2012. Service innovation and performance in SMEs[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,32(2):216-237. Munoz P, Dimov D. 2015. The call of the whole in understanding the development of sustainable ventures[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,30(4):632-654. O'Reilly III C A, Tushman M L. 2013. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,27(4):324-338. Osborn R N, Hunt J G, Jauch L R. 2002. Toward a contextual theory of leadership[J]. Leadership Quarterly,13(6):797-837. Paeleman I, Vanacker T. 2015. Less is more,or not? On the interplay between bundles of slack resources, firm performance and firm survival[J]. Journal of Management Studies,52(6):819-848. Phelps C C. 2010. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,53(4):890-913. Presutti M, Boari C, Majocchi A, et al. 2019. Distance to customers, absorptive capacity and innovation in high-tech firms: The dark face of geographical proximity[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,57(2):343-361. Qian G, Li L. 2003. Profitability of small-and medium-sized enterprises in high-tech industries: The case of the biotechnology industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,24(9):881-887. Rogers W M, Schmitt N. 2004. Parameter recovery and model fit using multidimensional composites: A comparison of four empirical parceling algorithms[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research,39(3):379-412. Sarkis J. 2020. Supply chain sustainability:Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,41(1):63-73. Severtson D J, Burt J E. 2012. The influence of mapped hazards on risk beliefs: A proximity-based modeling approach[J]. Risk Analysis,32(2):259-280. Sharfman M P, Wolf G, Chase R B, et al. 1988. Antecedents of organizational slack[J]. Academy of Management Review,13 (4):601-614. Sheppard M. 2020. The relationship between discretionary slack and growth in small firms[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,16(1):195-219. Simsek Z, Veiga J F, Lubatkin M H. 2007. The impact of managerial environmental perceptions on corporate entrepreneurship: Towards understanding discretionary slack's pivotal role[J]. Journal of Management Studies,44(8):1398-1424. Soetanto D, Jack S L. 2018. Slack resources, exploratory and exploitative innovation and the performance of small technology-based firms at incubators[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer,43(5):1213-1231. Solís-Molina M, Hernández-Espallardo M, Rodríguez-Orejuela A. 2018. Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity[J]. Journal of business research,91: 181-194. Su Z, Yang H. 2018. Managerial ties and exploratory innovation: An opportunity-motivation-ability perspective[J]. IEEE Trans-actions on Engineering Management,65(2):227-238. Tabesh P, Vera D, Keller R T. 2019. Unabsorbed slack resource deployment and exploratory and exploitative innovation: How much does CEO expertise matter[J]. Journal of Business Research,94:65-80. Tan J, Peng M W. 2003. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy[J]. Strategic Management Journal,24(13):1249-1263. Terziovski M. 2010. Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: A resource-based view[J]. Strategic Management Journal,31(8):892-902. Tian X L, Gang K O U, Zhang W. 2020. Geographic distance, venture capital and technological performance: Evidence from Chinese enterprises[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,158:120155. Tognazzo A, Gubitta P, Favaron S D. 2016. Does slack always affect resilience? A study of quasi-medium-sized Italian firms[J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,28(9-10):768-790. Tran K T, Nguyen P V, Nguyen L M. 2018. The role of financial slack,employee creative self-efficacy and learning orientation in innovation and organizational performance[J]. Administrative Sciences,8(4):82. Troilo G, De Luca L M, Atuahene-Gima K. 2014. More innovation with less? A strategic contingency view of slack resources, information search and radical innovation[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,31(2):259-277. Vanacker T, Collewaert V, Zahra S A. 2017. Slack resources, firm performance and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,38(6):1305-1326. Voss G B, Sirdeshmukh D, Voss Z G. 2008. The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,51(1):147-164. Wan W P, Yiu D W. 2009. From crisis to opportunity: Environmental jolt, corporate acquisitions and firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,30(7):791-801. Wang C, Rodan S, Fruin M, et al. 2014. Knowledge networks, collaboration networks and exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,57(2):484-514. Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal,5(2):171-180. Wiklund J, Shepherd D. 2003. Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of small and medium-sized business[J]. Strategic Management Journal,24(13):1307-1314. Yang T T, Li C R. 2011. Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development: The moderating effects of environmental dynamism and competitiveness[J]. Management Decision,49(9):1444-1470. Zhang S X, Huang H, Wei F. 2020. Geographical distance to the epicenter of covid-19 predicts the burnout of the working population:Ripple effect or typhoon eye effect[J]. Psychiatry Research,288(2):112998. |
[1] | 李兆辰, 程文银 刘生龙 胡鞍钢, . 国家高新区、创新合作与创新质量 基于双元创新合作的视角 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2024, 45(01): 110-124. |
[2] | 杨忠海, 党春晓, 李瑛玫.
数字化转型能提升企业全员劳动生产率吗?——基于人力资本与双元创新的中介效应
[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2023, 44(09): 30-46. |
[3] | 杨博旭, 王玉荣, 李兴光, 张冰. 技术多元化对双元创新绩效的影响研究:基于正式与非正式制度环境的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(12): 145-162. |
[4] | 潘宏亮. 创业者吸收能力、双元创新战略对天生国际化企业成长绩效的影响[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(12): 94-110. |
[5] | 李悦 王怀勇. 双元创新行为与心理脱离:矛盾式领导风格的调节作用及其边界条件[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(10): 157-170. |
[6] | 焦媛媛 付轼辉 沈志锋 孙静. 我国中小企业社会关系网络对其“走出去”意愿的作用机制研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(01): 127-142. |
[7] | 赵筱媛 赵勇 赵康. 政策文本计量视角下中美两国中小企业政策对比研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(12): 3-11. |
[8] | 郑烨 吴建南. 政府支持行为何以促进中小企业创新绩效?——一项基于扎根理论的多案例研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(10): 41-54. |
[9] | 宋春华 马鸿佳 郭海. 学习导向、双元创新与天生国际化企业绩效关系研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(09): 126-140. |
[10] | 刘凤朝 赵雪键 马荣康. 政府采购促进了企业R&D投入吗?——基于中小企业上市公司的实证分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(07): 42-52. |
[11] | 高凡雅 田高良 王喜. 中小企业履行社会责任能缓解融资约束吗?[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(06): 133-143. |
[12] | 冉爱晶 周晓雪 肖咪咪 崔淼. 我国中小企业组织创新氛围的架构和异质性研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(05): 72-84. |
[13] | 胡文安 罗瑾琏 钟竞. 双元创新搜索视角下组织创新绩效的提升路径研究:领导行为的触发作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(04): 60-72. |
[14] | 岳宇君 胡汉辉. 科技型中小企业支持政策传导机制及博弈分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(04): 105-116. |
[15] | 白景坤 丁军霞. 网络能力与双元创新的关系——环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(08): 138-148. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||